Warren County
Bicycle Plan
Prepared by:
Project Partner:
January 2012
1. Introduction ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ………………………….. 1
a. Purpose ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. …………………………….. 1
b. Previous Studies/Process ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ……. 1
c. Benefits of Bicycle Facilities………………………………………………………………
……………………………………… ………….. 1
d. Terminology ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ………………………. 3
2. Existing Conditions ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ………………… 4
a. Existing Bike Routes ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ……………. 4
b. Existing Destinations ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ………….. 4
3. Priority Connections ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ………………. 6
a. Local Priority Routes ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. …………… 6
b. WCS&QBO Priority Rou t
es ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ….. 6
c. A/GFTC Staff Priority Routes ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. .. 7
d. Priority Bicycle Network ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ……… 7
4. Design Standards ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. …………………… 8
a. Overview ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. …………………………… 8
b. Types of Bicycle Facilities ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ……. 9
5. Physical Feasibility Analysis ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. …… 13
6. Imple m
entation ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. …………………… 14
a. Other Improvements ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ………… 17
b. Partnerships ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. …………………….. 18
c. Funding Sources ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ………………. 18
Appendix 1: Detailed Maps ………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………. ………….. 20
Warren County Bicycle Plan
1
1. Introduction
a. Purpose
In association with the Warren County Safe & Quality Bicycling Organization
(WCS&QBO), the Adirondack/Glens Falls Transportation Council (A/GFTC) has
prepared this Warren County Bicycle Plan. This plan is intended to identify
existing conditions, create a methodology to select needed improvements, set
priorities for short ‐ and long‐ term goal s, and facili
tate implementation in the
future. The goal of this plan is to provide a framework for future improvements
which will result in a more expansive and comprehensive network of bicycle
facilities in Warren County.
This plan has been created in conjunction with a public outreach process which
takes into account the prio rities of the loc
al municipalities in Warren County. All
existing community master plans have been reviewed, stakeholder interviews
have been conducted, and a public meeting has been held to review the draft
version of the plan. This process is intended to strengthen ties between the local
municipalities, County DPW, A/GFTC, an d the WCS&
QBO, so that partnerships can
continue in the future implementation of the priority projects.
b. Previous Studies/Process
This plan is in many respects an update to the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
prepared by A/GFTC in 2000. As this plan was prepared with help from
WCS&QBO, the focus of th e
up
date is solely on bicycle improvements within
Warren County. Pedestrian systems will be addressed in a separate planning
effort; however, in many cases, improvements to bicycle facilities will also benefit
pedestrians.
To create the plan, the project team developed a work plan which included:
• An inventory of existing conditions
• A review of all available co
mmu
nity plans and priorities for each
municipality in the County
• Identification of priority network connections
• A methodology to select appropriate design features, and
• A plan for implementation
This process enabled the project team to identify feasible, real ‐world actions that
can be taken to improve bi
king within the county in general. By coordinating
implementation across local, county, and state levels, it is hoped that the plan will
increase the efficiency and efficacy of improvements to the bicycle network.
c. Benefits of Bicycle Facilities
Biking, whether conducted as a mode of transportati on
or as
a recreational
activity, offers a wide variety of personal, social, and environmental benefits. On a
personal level, biking is not only a method to become or stay physically active, but
is also an affordable, fun transportation method available to all ages. Socially,
Bicycle Plan Goal:
Provide a framework for
future improvements
which will result in a
more expansive and
comprehensive network
of bicycle facilities in
Warren County.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
2
biking reduces health care costs and vehicular traffic, can provide a healthy
activity for families and children, and can provide an important component to the
local economy in terms of tourism. In terms of the environment, biking can be an
effective way to reduce dependence on the automobile, and subsequently reduce
carbon emissions. In creasing opportuni
ties for cycling can potentially increase the
associated benefits, which include:
Economic Development: Investing in bicycle infrastructure can attract
tourists to an area, where they might otherwise spend their vacation
dollars elsewhere. One example is North Carolina’s Outer Banks, which
generates $60 million annually in economic activity through bi cycle
tourism, after spendi
ng $6.7 million on bicycle infrastructure. This one ‐
time investment has resulted in an annual nine ‐to ‐one return. An analysis
of the demographics of visitors drawn to bike on the Outer Banks shows
that the bicycle tourists tend to be affluent (50% earning more than
$100,000 a year and 87% earning more than $50,000) and educated (40%
with a maste rs or doctoral degre
e). Finally, expenditures by the 680,000
annual visiting bicyclists support 1,400 jobs in the area.
1
On a local level, it is estimated long ‐distance, multi ‐day bicycling
vacationers in New York spend between $100 and $300 per day on food,
lodging, and other items. A group of six cyclists, therefore, each spending
$250 per day on seven ‐day trip would add up to $10,500.
2 This type of
economic benefit could add up to significant revenue for the region.
Separate from tourism, economic benefits from increased bicycle
infrastructure also abound. Portland, Oregon, well known for being a
bike ‐friendly city, saw $90 million in bicycle ‐related activity in 2008.
Almost 60 percent of that activity was comprised of r etail,
rental,
and
repair, with manufacturing and distribution, bicycle events, and
professional services.
3
Bike trails can also raise the value of nearby homes. According to a study
completed for the Delaware Department of Transportation, proximity to
an off ‐road bike trail can raise the value of a home by 4% or more.
4 This
supports the idea that more and more people are seeking to live in
bikeable communities.
Quality of Life: An increase in cycling is often associated with an
increased quality of life. Numerous intangible benefits are associated with
bicycling and walking. Having safe, accessible bicycle facilities can provide
children and families with another option for recrea tion
or
1 Lawrie, et al, “Pathways to Prosperity: the economic impact of investments in bicycling facilities,” N.C. Department of
Transportation Division of Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation, Technical Report, July 2004.
http://www.ncdot.org/transit/bicycle/safety/safety_economicimpact.html
2 “Bicyclists Bring Business – A Guide for Attracting Bicyclists to New York’s Canal Communities,” Erie Canalway National Heritage
Corridor, Parks & Trails New York, and New York State Canal Corporation, 2010.
http://www.ptny.org/pdfs/canalway_trail/b3/Bicyclists_bring_business.pdf
3 Alta Planning + Design, “Bicycle ‐related Industry Growth in Portland,” September 2008 (updated from June 2006.)
http://www.altaplanning.com /App_Content/files/fp_docs/2008%20Portland%20Bicycle ‐Related%20Economy%20Report.pdf 4 Racca, David P. and Dhanju, Amardeep, “Property Value/Desirability Effects of Bike Paths Adjacent to Residential Areas,” Center
for Applied Demography & Survey Research, November 2006. http://128.175.63.72/projects/DOCUMENTS/bikepathfinal.pdf
Figure 1 ‐ Bicycle tourists (photo courtesy of
Dauset Trails Nature Center)
Warren County Bicycle Plan
3
transportation. According to the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information
Center, “Providing more travel options can increase a sense of
independence in seniors, young people, and others who cannot or choose
not to drive. Increased levels of bicycling and walking can have a great
impact on an area’s sense of livability by creating safe and friendl y places
for people to live and work.” A spe
cific example comes again from
Portland, where policies to encourage bicycling have reduced auto ‐
dependency, saving the residents on transportation costs. In comparison
with the median American city, Portland residents save $2.6 billion a year
in terms of miles traveled and hours spent in vehicles.
3
Transportation: With the exception of recreational riders, every cyclist
represents one less car on the road. Although many vehicle trips are less
than three miles in length, which could easily be accomplished by most
cyclists, 72 percent of these short trips are made in cars. Bicyclists in
some areas may arrive at their destina t
ions faster than if they had driven
a car, since they can often bypass congestion and gridlock traffic.5
Public Health: Cycling is a great form of exercise, reducing the risks for
many cardiovascular diseases. Enabling and encouraging residents to
bicycle also results in public health benefits. For example, according to
the American Heart Association, with each dollar a community invests in
multi ‐use trails, $3 in medical cost savings is realize d
.6
With all these benefits, many communities are demonstrating a strong interest in
strengthening and improving bicycle infrastructure, on both a local and regional
level. Warren County, and the communities within, has been active in pursuing
ways to directly and indirectly improve the biking experience in the region. This
has included innovative partnerships
to promote bi
ke education and events as
well as physical projects such as the Warren County Bikeway. With this plan,
Warren County is underscoring its ongoing commitment to encouraging bicycle
activity for the benefit of residents, business owners, and visitors alike.
d. Terminology
Throughout this plan, a variety of spe cific
terms
are used. To reduce confusion, a
short glossary has been provided:
Bike Routes:
The alignments (on ‐ or off ‐road) along which bicycles are specifically
accommodated, as designated by the authority of the roadway owner. Bike
routes typically feature directional and/or informational route markings. Note:
Roadway not specifically designated as a “bike route” does not imply that it
cannot or should not be used by cyclists. However, some cyclists may find that
non ‐designa
ted roadways are not as accommodating to cyclists.
5 Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, “National Bicycling and Walking Study: 15–Year Status Report”, May 2010
http://katana.hsrc.unc.edu/cms/downloads/15 ‐year_report.pdf
6 Weintraub, William S. et al, “Value of Primordial and Primary Prevention for Cardiovascular Disease : A Policy Statement From
the American Heart Association,” Circulation, online publication July 25, 2011
http://http//circ.ahajournals.org/c ontent/early/2011/07/25/CIR.0b013e3182285a81
Important Terms:
Bike ROUTE: The on ‐
or off ‐road alignment
designated specifically
as accommodating to
bicycles.
Bike FACILITY:
The
physical surface or
feature used by
cyclists.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
4
Bike Facilities: The physical surface on which the cyclists ride. These may include,
but are not limited to, multi ‐use trails, bike lanes, road shoulders, or vehicle travel
lanes. A description of the different types of bicycle facilities is included in Section
4 of this plan. Bike facilities can also include other features desi g
ned to
accommodate/encourage cycling, such as bike parking facilities.
Design Standards:
The geometric specifications regarding pavement width and
other elements which are recommended to be met in order to be considered a
bicycle facility.
2. Existing Conditions
This plan is intended to guide the improvement of bicycle facilities and the future
designation of bicycle routes throughout the County. However, this effort is not
“starting from scratch”, bu
t is rather the continuation of many years of work by
several agencies. Warren County, along with A/GFTC, local bike groups, and
individual municipalities, has been active in encouraging accommodations for
cyclists. It is therefore important to take stock of the conditions for cyclists as
they sta nd today.
a. Existing Bike Rout
es
Bicycle facilities in Warren County consist of on ‐road designated routes and multi ‐
use trail systems. (See map 1) The centerpiece of this system is the Warren
County Bikeway, a mainly off ‐road bike facility which extends from the City of
Glens Falls to the Village of Lake George .
This paved tr
ail provides access to many
important destinations and also links with the Feeder Canal Trail via on ‐road
connections. In addition to the facilities shown in Map 1, other on ‐road facilities
feature “Share the Road” or other bicycle ‐related signage.
The Town of Queensbury rec
ently designated several roadways in the southwest
part of the Town as on‐street Bicycle Routes. The identification of these roadways
as potential bike routes was facilitated by WCS&QBO prior to the commencement
of this plan; the designation process described in Section 6 of this plan can serve
as a model for other towns as
well.
There are also other bicycle route networks and facilities surrounding Warren
County, especially in Saratoga, Washington, and Hamilton Counties. These include
networks such as the Saratoga County Heritage Trail, New York State Bike Route
#9, the Champlain Canal Trail, and the “Bike the Byways” network .
Creating and
maintaini
ng strong connections to these neighboring opportunities is a key aspect
of this plan.
b. Existing Destinations
Warren County has a variety of potential destinations for bike trips. (See Map 1)
Many of the hamlet areas, shown in pink on Map 1, serve as centers of activity for
residents and visitors. Stan d‐alone
employment centers are located throughout
the County, including industrial parks and the Warren County Municipal Center.
Schools also constitute important bicycle destinations. Finally, many of the
Warren County Bicycle Plan
5
recreational amenities and parks in the County are also biking destinations, both
for tourists and for employees. These include active recreation amenities, such as
amusement parks, shopping, and cultural features located in and around the city,
village, and hamlets, as well as passive parks and natural areas spread throughout
the County.
Æ
bÆ
b
Æ
b
Æ
b
Æ
b
^
_k
®q
®q
®q
ñ
ñ
ñ
ñ
ñ
ñ ñ
ñ
ñ
ñ ñ
ñ
ñ
ñ
ñ
kk
k
k kk
kk
k
k
k
k k
k
k
kk
k k
k
k
k
k
k k
kk k
k
k
k
k
k kkk
k
k
k
k
k
k k
k
k
k
k k
k
Bolton
S T
ATE
ROUTE
9
N^ _
Johnsburg
Hague
Chester
Thurman
Horicon
Stony Creek
Queensbury
Warrensburg
Lake Luzerne
Lake
George
Glens Falls
§
¨ ¦87
§
¨ ¦87
STATE ROUTE 8
STATE ROUTE 28
MAIN ST
STATE ROUTE 9
STATE ROUTE 9
STATE ROUTE 8
.
Map 1 – Bike Routes and Destinations
No Scale
Legend
kPublic Schools
ñGovernment Office
^
_Major Retail Center
Æ
bRail Station
Bike Routes
On-Road Bike Connections
Feeder Canal P ark Heritage Trail
Warren County Bikeway
Waterbodies
Parks (Local)
Hamlet Area (APA Designation)
^
_k
®q
ñ
ñ
ñ
ñ
k
k
k
k k
k
k
kk
k
k k
k
k
k k
k
k
k
k
k
k
k
^
_
Saratoga
Ridge RdBay StGlen St
Sherman Ave
Broad St
South St
DIX Ave
Warren St
Lake
George
§
¨ ¦87
§
¨ ¦87
STAT E ROUT E 9
Inset Area
Warren County Bicycle Plan
6
3. Priority Connections
The goal of this plan is to provide a framework for future improvements which
will result in a more expansive and comprehensive network of bicycle facilities in
Warren County. Most of these facilities are likely to be located along existing
roadways. However, it is not realistic to assume that every roadway will be the
focus of bi
cycle improvement projects, especially given current funding
limitations. Conversely, even if a roadway meets the minimum requirements for
the appropriate design standard, there may be reasons to refrain from pursuing
designation as a bicycle route, at least in the short ‐term. Possible reasons to del ay
designati
ng a roadway as a bicycle route include: location (does the roadway
provide connections to other bike routes?); maintenance (will the bicycle facility
require a level of maintenance which is currently not feasible?); and/or public
input (are there local objections to formal designation as a bike route?).
As such, an im p
ortant component of this plan involved setting priorities to
identify which roadways are recommended to be designated as bike routes. To
set realistic and feasible actions for this plan, several factors were considered,
described in greater detail below.
a. Local Priority Routes
Many of the local municipalities have a ddressed
the need for bicy
cle facilities in
planning documents; these ideas should be taken into account. As part of this
plan, all local planning documents were reviewed to determine the stated bicycle
transportation priorities in each municipality. On Maps 2 and 3, the roadways
shown in red were specifically mentioned within the individual mu
nicipal plan as
being suitable for current bike use, or desired for bike use in the future.
This analysis highlights the fact that not every community in Warren County has
stated priorities concerning cycling. Some communities have identified specific
on ‐ and off ‐road alignments, while others include a gen eral
statement of su
pport
for bicycling issues. Still others make no mention of cycling at all; however, this
should not infer that the community does not desire accommodation of bicycles
on the roadways. Nothing in this plan is intended to prevent local municipalities
from supporting the establishment of additional bicycle facilities, nor to obligate
commu nities to engage in projects in the future.
b. WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Maintaining and promoting safe, functional bicycle facilities along the roads most
used by cyclists is a key goal of this plan. To facilitate this, members of the
WCS&QBO generated a list of cycling routes. These road ways represent the
alignme
nts of existing bike events, important connections to recreation
destinations, and roadways which are enjoyable to ride. Although recreational
riding is not the focus of this plan, it is important to recognize those routes which
are favored by the biking community. These routes are shown in gold on Maps 2
and 3.
Local Priorities: Many
municipalities have
specifically addressed
bicycle facilities in their
planning documents,
including:
• Bolton
• Chester
• Horicon
• Johnsburg
• Town and Village
of Lake George
• Lake Luzerne
• Queensbury
• Warrensburg
Warren County Bicycle Plan
7
c. A/GFTC Staff Priority Routes
In addition to the priorities stated above, it will be important to include regional
transportation needs into this bicycle plan. A/GFTC staff therefore identified
several roadway alignments which fulfill a regional transportation role. These
include connections to destinations within Warren County, as well as bike routes
in adjacent counties. Thes e
routes, shown in green on Maps 2 and 3, were
selected to allow for transportation connectivity, rather than just recreational
enjoyment.
d. Priority Bicycle Network
As part of this plan, a methodology to prioritize the importance of roadway
improvements was developed. Using this methodology, the Priority Network was
developed. Se e
Maps 2 & 3, as
well as the more detailed maps for each
municipality located in Appendix 1. This includes on ‐ and off ‐road connections
which are proposed to be the focus of bicycle improvements in the future.
Showing the needs and desires of all three groups simultan eously allows for a
rudime
ntary hierarchy to be assigned.
1. On ‐Road Connections:
Roadways which have been selected by all three
groups are considered high priority. Whenever feasible, upgraded bicycle
facilities such as bike shoulders or shared use lanes should be included in
improvement projects on these high priority routes. Those routes
selected by two of the three groups are considered still important, but of
a lower priority for im
plementation. If feasible, bicycle facilities should be
included in any upcoming capital improvement projects. If bicycle
facilities cannot be accommodated, “Share the Road” signage may be
recommended to raise awareness of cyclists on the part of motorists.
Roadways which are important to only one group are inclu ded in
this plan
as well, with the understanding that improvements along these roadways
may take place in the long ‐term.
2. Multi ‐use trails:
In terms of off ‐road connections, only those previously
proposed in local planning documents have been added to the priority
connections map. However, many other multi ‐use trails may be feasible.
If pursuing an off ‐road connection is the preferred alternative, the need
to acquire easements or rights ‐of ‐way should be the initial consid eration.
Trail
alignments through recreation/open space areas may be a feasible
option which minimizes property acquisition burdens. In addition,
National Grid has a standard process and dedicated staff to evaluate
whether they will grant access rights for multi ‐use trails, making them
another potential partner.
This hierarchy is intend ed to provide
one tool in the decision ‐making process. It
may be useful in situations in which there is some leeway in selecting among
several potential projects. However, the selection of capital projects involves
other equally important factors. The remainder of this plan is intended to address
the design, f easibility, and i
mplementation of bicycle improvement projects.
DIAMOND POINT RD
GOL F C OURSE RD
SCHROON RIVER RD
PAD ANARUM RD
HARRISB URG RD
Johnsburg
Bolton
Hague
Chester
Thurman
Horicon
Stony CreekQueensbury
Warrensburg
Lake Luzerne
Lake
George
Glens
Falls
BAY RD
CALL ST
LAKE AVE
GLEN ATHOL RD
HIGH ST
STATE ROUTE 9ATATEKA DR
RIDGE RD
E RIVER DR
RIDGE RD
ROUTE 9
STA T
E
ROUT E
8
STATE ROUTE 28
LAKE SHORE DR
E S
HORE DR
WALL ST
VALENTIN E
P
OND RD
S TATE ROUTE
9
RIVER RD
STATE ROUTE 8
S T
A T
E ROUTE
2 8
.
Map 2 – Priorities for Bicycle Facilities
No Scale
Legend
Existing Warren County Bikeway
Bike Routes
Proposed Off-Road Trails
WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Local Priority Routes
A/GFTC Staff Priority Routes
Waterbodies
MUR RAY
VETERANS RD
RICHARDS ON
QU AKER AVE
RID GE RD
UPPER SH ERMAN AVE
BAY RD
HAVILAND RD
BAY ST
PO TTER RD
WEST MO UNTAIN RD
GURNEY LN
LUZERNE RD
CRONIN RD
DIXO N RD
AVIATION RD
COUNTRY CLUB RD
CORINTH RD
DIX AVE
WE
S
T MO U
NTAIN RDSTATE ROUTE 9
GLEN ST
STATE ROUTE 149
R
IDGE ST
BROAD ST
WARREN ST
BOULEVARD
C H
E
STNUT RIDGE RD
.
Map 3 – Priorities for Bicycle Facilities (Inset)
No Scale
Legend
Existing Warren County Bikeway
Bike Routes
Proposed Off-Road Trails
WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Local Priority Routes
A/GFTC Staff
Priority Routes
Waterbodies
Warren County Bicycle Plan
8
4. Design Standards
a. Overview
Design standards for bicycle facilities can apply to the location, width, pavement,
and other features such as drainage grates and protective railings. These
standards may be applied to part of an on ‐road facility or an multi ‐use trail.
The selection of a bicycle facility depends on many va riables: the type
of cyclist
likely to use the facility; traffic mix, volume, speed, parking, and sight distances
(for on ‐road facilities); bicycle speed, grade, multi‐use capacity, and roadway/rail
crossings (for off ‐road facilities). Several agencies, including NYSDOT, FHWA, and
AASHTO, have compiled manuals and guidance documents which can help to
select th
e most appropriate design standards for each facility.
For the purposes of this document, the most commonly applicable design
standards have been summarized below. This summary is intended to aid in the
prioritization of improvement projects, by outlining minimum standards for the
types of facilities most like ly
to be proposed
in Warren County. The design
standards are based on those in the NYSDOT Highway Design Manual Chapter 17
(Bicycle Facility Design), and on AASHTO’s Guide for the Development of Bicycle
Facilities . Standards for features such as bridges or railings have not been
included; refer to the appropriate gui
dance document for detail concerning these
facilities.
This summary is not intended to limit the range of potential bicycle facilities in
Warren County. As new standards are adopted, and different types of bicycle
facilities tested and deployed, it is recommended that these new techniques be
reviewed to determine if they may be appropriate to condi tions in Warren
County.
Guidance Documents
for Bicycle Facility
Design Standards:
American Association of
State Highway and
Transportation Officials
(AASHTO): Guide for the
Development of Bicycle
Facilities , 1999
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA):
Bikesafe: Bicycle
Countermeasure Selection
System , May 2006;
Selecting Roadway Design
Treatments to
Accommodate Bicycles ,
1992
New York State
Department of
Transportation: Highway
Design
Manual, Chapter 17
Bicycle Facili ty
Design,
2006
Warren County Bicycle Plan
9
b. Types of Bicycle Facilities
1. Bike Shoulders (aka Wide Shoulders)
Most appropriate for: Rural/suburban roadways with limited
sections of curbing and without on ‐street parking
Design standards: 4’ ‐wide (min.) shoulder for non ‐curbed
roadways with speeds under 40 MPH. Width increased to 6’
for higher ‐speed/higher‐ volume roadways, roads which
exceed
5% grade for 6 miles or longer, or roads with curbs or
other obstacles at the edge of pavement. (See Figure 2&3)
Advantages:
• Many bike shoulders already exist in the County
• No additional maintenance required beyond that
which is required for the roadway
• Can sometimes be accommodated via re ‐striping
•
Appropriate for rural and suburban areas
• No additional striping at intersections
Disadvantages:
• Less comfortable for beginning/average cyclists than
bike lanes (see page 10)
• May require widening of the roadway in certain areas
• Can pose conflict with on ‐street parking
4’ Shoulder –
no curbTravel Lane –
width variesTravel Lane –
width varies6’ Shoulder –
with curb
Figure 3 ‐ Bike shoulders (photo courtesy of ANCA)
Figure
2 ‐ Design Standard for bike shoulders
Warren County Bicycle Plan
10
2. Shared‐ Use Lanes (a.k.a. Wide Curb Lanes)
Most appropriate for: Roadways with width constraints
Design standards: 14’ ‐wide desired/12’ ‐wide minimum travel
lane (See Figure 4&5). Some shared ‐use lanes deploy a
“sharrow” roadway striping, which reinforces the need to
share the road with cyclists.
Advantages:
• Minimal striping or mainte nance requir
ed
• Benefits to non ‐bicycle traffic: accommodates buses and
truck turning movements/emergency maneuvers
• Greater lateral mobility for advanced cyclists (can use the
whole lane if needed to avoid obstacles)
Disadvantages:
• Least comfortable for beginning/average cyclists
• Wider travel lanes can increase traffic speeds
• Can pose con flict with on ‐s
treet parking
Figure 5 ‐ Example of cyclist in shared lane (photo courtesy
of pedbikeinfo.org)
Figure 4 ‐ Design Standard for shared lanes
14’ desired
travel lane Shared
travel lane Parking
lane
(width
varies)
22’ minimum
Warren County Bicycle Plan
11
3. Bike Lanes
Most appropriate for: Urban roadways with curbing and on ‐
street parking
Design standards: 4’ ‐wide (with no on ‐street parking/curb) or
5’ ‐wide (with on ‐street parking/curb) striped lane located
between travel lane and parking lane/curb. (Figure 6)
Advantages:
• Channelizes bike traffic
• More comfortable for begi nning/average
cy
clists to ride
• Minimizes cars swerving into other lane to avoid cyclists
• Higher profile/visibility for cyclists
Disadvantages:
• Intersections can become complicated with extra bike
lane striping and signage (Figure 7)
• May require additional ROW width
• Mainly an urban roadway feature
• Can be blocked by parke d
cars
•
Can pose conflict with on ‐street parking
4. Multi ‐Use Trail/Path (aka Off ‐Road Trail)
Most appropriate for: Areas with existing linear ROW
(rail/utility corridors, for example) which link destinations
Design standards: 10’ ‐wide recommended for a two ‐way path
(12’ preferred)
Advantages:
• Least pote ntial
for vehicl
e/bike conflict
• Most comfortable for beginning/average cyclists
• Potential to create direct links
• Recreation amenity
Disadvantages:
• Highest cost to implement – requires ROW acquisition,
design, and construction
• Requires separate maintenance; many municipalities may
be unable to provide maintenance
Figure 6 ‐ Striped bike lane (photo courtesy of pedbikeinfo.org)
Figure 7 ‐ Example of bike lane signage
Figure 8 – Multi ‐Use trail
Warren County Bicycle Plan
12
5. “Share the Road” Signage
Most appropriate for: Roadways which do not have sufficient
shoulder width to support designated use for bicycles. Note
that the signs themselves do not constitute a bicycle facility,
but can be deployed along on ‐road connectors.
Design standards: Set by the Manual of Uniform Traffic
Control Devices (MUTCD)
Advantages:
• Inexp ensive
to deploy
•
No physical changes needed to roadway
• Roadway need not be a designated Bike Route to have
Share the Road signs
Disadvantages:
• Does not provide dedicated space for cyclists
• Over‐deployment dilutes the efficacy of the signs
Figure 9 ‐ Diagram of Share
the Road signage
Warren County Bicycle Plan
13
5. Physical Feasibility Analysis
In addition to identifying the location of important bicycle connections (the
Priority Network), and summarizing the applicable design standards for conditions
in Warren County, this plan also analyzed whether roadways may currently have
the requisite pavement width meet the Design Standard appropriate to the
context. A GIS map was prepared wh
ich compares the existing shoulder width to
the width required by the bike shoulders Design Standards outlined in Section 4.7
This assumption creates a conservative analysis, as the width necessary for the
wide shoulder Design Standard is greater than or equal to the dimensions needed
for any other type of bicycle facility. As such, it can be broadly assumed that a
roadway which is wide enough to support the Design Standard for bike shoulders
will likely also be
wide enough for shared lanes, bike lanes, and so forth.
The existing shoulder width was based on GIS information, then verified via
inspection by A/GFTC staff. For the purposes of this plan, the average paved
shoulder width was measured for each section of roadway. Gravel shoulders
were not in cl
uded in this analysis. This analysis does not take into account the
condition of the pavement. The shoulder width was then compared to the posted
speed limit for the roadway. It should be noted that the posted speed limit is not
the only factor which can be taken into accou
nt when determining the required
width of a bike shoulder. Topography, functional classification of the roadway,
traffic volume and mix, and sight distance are all other factors which can be taken
into account to determine an appropriate bike shoulder width. Posted speed was
chosen as the analysis method for th is pl
an to facilitate the GIS analysis.
The results of this analysis are shown in Map 4, which indicates that the majority
of roadways do not have current sufficient width to meet the wide shoulder
Design Standard. It is crucial to note that lack of shoulder width does not im ply
that a roadway is inher
ently unsafe or unsuitable for use by cyclists. The intent of
this mapping exercise was to determine which, if any, roadways could currently
meet (or come close to meeting) the appropriate design standard. This
information can be useful in helping roadway owners determine the scope of
work required to create or enhan c
e bicycle facilities in the future.
It must also be noted that many roadways in Warren County are “user highways”.
These are roadways in which the right ‐of ‐way width is the same as the pavement
width. As such, widening these types of roads usually involves acq u
isition of
property from adjacent landowners, which can significantly increase the cost and
time frame of construction projects.
7 Not all roadways on the priority network were analyzed during the course of this
mapping analysis.
JohnsburgBolton
Hague
Chester
Thurman
Horicon
Stony Creek
Queensbury
Warrensburg
Lake Luzerne
Lake
George
Glens Falls
L A KE
S H
O
RE
D R
B A
Y R D
C
A
LL
S T
L
A K
E
A
V E
H
A R
R
IS B
UR G
R D
G
L
E N
ATH
O L
RD
S TA
TE
R O
UT
E
2 8
H
IG
H
S T
F
R I
E N D
S
L A
K E
R D
PA
L
IS
A D
ES
R
D
E S
H
O RE
D
R
M AI
N
S TSTA
TE
R O
U
TE
9
W AR
R E
N S
B U
R G
R
D
ST
A T
E
R
O UTE
8
A TA
TE KA
D
R
G O
L
F CO
URSE
R D
R
I
D G
E
R D
S
T
A TE
R O U
TE
9
N
B
EA
V E R
P
O
ND
R D
AT
HO L
R
D
CO R
I
N TH
R
D
HO
R
IC O
N
A V
E
PO
TT
E R
R D
CRO N
IN
R D
M
U
RR
AY
RD
E RIV E
R
D R
L
A KE
S
H O
R
E
D R
ST A
TE
RO
UT
E 9
L
A
KE
S H
O RE
DR
S T
A
TE R
O
UT
E
8
S TA
TE
R
O UT
E
9
R I
D G
E
R D
.
Map 4 – Physical Conditions Map
(Shoulder width vs. posted speed limit)
Legend
Shoulder Width Meets Applicable Bike Design Standard
No
Ye s
Other Roads
Waterbodies
Shoulder and posted speed conditions
based on field observation by A/GFTC
staff and may be subject to revision.
Information as presented is not to be
used for construction or engineering
and is intended for planning purposes only.
No Scale
No – Roadside Obstacles
Warren County Bicycle Plan
14
6. Implementation
The priority network identified in Section 3 is intended to serve as a guide for the
location of bicycle facility improvements. However, several other factors will play
an important role in the timing and selection of projects which further this plan.
These are listed below.
• Funding availability
. As of the date of this report, funding for stand ‐
alone on‐street bicycle features is so limited as to be essentially
unavailable. However, other funding streams may become available
which can further the implementation of this project. For example,
there may be funding for off ‐road connections which would allow for
exte nsions of the Warren County Bikeway, or for similar facilities to
be
constructed in the County.
• Complete Streets/Integration with other transportation projects
.
Given the current funding restrictions facing all aspects of
transportation, combining vehicle and bicycle improvements in the
same project may be the most efficient and effective course of
action. Since New York State recently enacted Complete Streets
legislation, it is likely that bicycle facilities will become a more
prominent element in the design and construction of roadways at the
State and Co unty
level. In addition, ther
e may be opportunities to
create or improve a bicycle facility during a local roadway or bridge
project in the future, regardless of the priority level assigned as a part
of this plan. Local agencies should take advantage of these
opportuniti es as
they arise.
• Phasing of Improvements
. For high ‐priority roadways, it may be
beneficial to adopt a phased approach to bicycle facility
improvements. For instance, if there is insufficient pavement/right ‐
of ‐way width to support creation of bike shoulders, or if the roadway
was very recently improved (and therefore not likely to be the focus
of a capital pr oject in the near futur
e), “Share the Road” signage can
be added as a short ‐term solution. This would allow the roadway
owner to designate the road as a Bike Route in the near future, while
still allowing for future physical improvements to take place in the
long term. In addition, ph asi
ng should take into account the location
of the facility. Connections to existing bike facilities, and continuous
routing between logical termini, are both important considerations.
• Target Cyclist
. Cyclists can span a wide range of experience levels and
skill. Experienced cyclists may feel more comfortable using certain
types of bicycle facilities than do children or less‐experienced adults.
This plan does not differentiate between types of cyclists, as the goal
is to encourage cycling for everyone. However, the desi re to
accommoda
te a wide range of cyclists should be balanced with the
benefits of providing a facility where none currently exists, even if
the facility may not be the most comfortable for every cyclist. This
balance should be informed by factors such as proximate land uses,
Complete Streets:
Complete streets provide
transportation options for everyone
by creating safer places to walk and
ride bicycles. They also provide better
access to public transportation,
improve transit efficiency, and calm
traffic. Complete streets create
complete communities.
In the summer of 2011, the NYS
legislature unanimously passed a
statewide Complete Streets bill, which
was signed by the governor an
d will
go into effect February 2012.
This law calls for Complete Street
Designs to be considered for all state,
county, and local transportation
projects that are undertaken by the
Department of Transportation or
receive both federal and state funding
and are subject to Department of
Transportation oversi
ght.
Most projects that receive federal
funding also receive state funding.
However, the law is not applicable on
many roads owned by villages, towns
and counties.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
15
location of the proposed facility, and physical constraints of the
roadway/trail area.
To further facilitate the decision‐ making process, a Bicycle Facility Improvement
Process has been developed. In general, the end goal is to have all of the
roadways in the priority network include a functional bicycle facility.
Theoretically, the roadway owners could designa t
e these roadways as bicycle
routes at any time. However, most agencies would prefer that the roadways that
they designate as formal bike routes meet (or come close to meeting) the criteria
for accepted design standards, such as those listed in this plan, prior to making
the designation.
The first step in that proce s
s is to select the appropriate Design Standards for the
roadway in question. The next step is to determine whether the roadway will
require additional improvements in order to be in compliance with the Design
Standards. The flow chart on the following page is intended to hel p gui
de this
process. Factors such as existing pavement width, available ROW, the feasibility
of off ‐road connections, and whether the roadway is slated for improvements in
the 5 ‐year Transportation Improvement Program, are all considered.
This process anticipates that most roadway owners would require that bicycle
facilities are largely consistent wit
h the design standards prior to designation as a
bike route; however, this is not prerequisite. The designation itself may be an
internal process, or may be at the behest of a separate group. For example, the
WCS&QBO recently petitioned the Town of Queensbury to designate several
roadways as bike routes; the Town Board passed a re sol
ution designating the
roadways as this plan was being drafted. This process could be replicated for any
town in Warren County. Similarly, this group, or any local municipality, may
choose to petition Warren County to designate their roadways as bike routes.
New York State maintains a separate system of bike routes, design
ed to
encourage long‐ distance connections statewide. However, they may be
petitioned to add bike route signage along State roadways. These can then
become an important part of a regional cycling promotion, such as the “Bike the
Byways” efforts put forth by the Adirondack North Country Association.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
16
Is pavement width sufficient to support
appropriate Design Standard?
Yes No
Roadway included in current TIP?
Yes No
¾ Restripe roadway
as part of capital
project
¾ Designate roadway
as a Bike Route;
add signage
¾ Ensure facility will
be maintained, if
necessary
Is restriping necessary to create appropriate bike
facility?
No Yes
¾ Designate roadway as a Bike
Route
¾ Add directional/ informational
Bike Route signage
¾ Ensure facility will be
maintained, if necessar
y
¾ Add Share the
Road Signage
¾ Designate roadway
as a Bike Route
¾ Restripe roadway
as part of long ‐
term road
improvements
Is there sufficient ROW available to widen pavement?
No Yes
Yes No
¾ Widen roadway as
part of road
improvements
¾ Designate roadway
as a Bike Route; add
signage
¾ Ensure facility will
be maintained
¾
¾ Add Share the Road
Signage
¾ Designate roadway as a
Bike Route
¾ Widen roadway as part of
long ‐term road
improvements
Is the roadway included in current TIP?
Could an off ‐road facility feasibly
be substituted?
Yes No
¾ Pursue funding for
multi ‐use trail
¾ Acquire ROW
¾ Construct trail
¾ Add Share the Road
signage
¾ Designate roadway as a
Bike Route
Bicycle Facility Improvement Selection Process
START: Determine the most appropriate design
standard for the roadway.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
17
Edge of travel
lane
Existin
g
Shoulder
Pavement Overlay: NOT
recommended
Edge of travel
lane Shoulder
Existin
g
Pavement Overlay: Recommended
a. Other Improvements
The implementation process outlined above is intended to apply to large ‐scale
improvement projects, which would apply to significant portions of a roadway.
However, there are also opportunities to pursue small ‐scale improvements, which
could also improve the biking experience in Warren County. These “spot”
improvements are focused on addressin g those small ‐scale issues which may not
require significant fundi
ng to complete. Several examples are included below.
1. Drainage grates. The direction of the grating pattern on storm drains is
an often ‐overlooked detail. (See figure 10). Grate openings which run
parallel to the travel direction can cause havoc for thin b i
cycle tires.
Ideally, grates should be selected which feature a “bike ‐friendly”
pattern. If this is not feasible, the grate should be situated so that the
pattern runs perpendicular to the travel direction.
2. Individual hazards. Over time, potholes and cracks can form in
pavement, causing hazardous conditions for cyclists. Sudde n chan
ges in
grade, whether because of pavement failure or manholes set at an
improper elevation, can be difficult for cyclists to maneuver, especially
at night. In the short term, pavement markings as specified in Chapter
3C of the Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices (figure 11) can
help alert cyclists that a po tentially haza
rdous condition exists. These
hazards can then be eliminated or minimized as the appropriate
roadway or utility project is undertaken in the future.
3. Pavement overlays. Even if no re ‐striping or widening is called for in a
paving project, there may still be good opportuniti es to im
prove
conditions for cyclists. Ensuring that the seam of the pavement does
not occur in the middle of the shoulder, or is properly feathered, will
provide a smooth, regular surface for cyclists. (See figure 12)
4. Roadway sweeping. Patches of gravel, especially on corners, can pose a
threat to cycl ists.
With the help of the cycling com
munity, it may be
possible to identify areas where significant gravel accumulation is
hampering safe cycling. Targeted road sweeping, even just a few times
a year, can help to reduce the potential hazards.
5. Bicycle Racks. Lack of adequate bike racks is a freq uent issue for
cyclists. Although some co
mmunities are beginning to require provision
of bicycle racks during project development approval, it can still be
difficult for cyclists to find a safe place to lock their bike. As a starting
point, bike racks should be provided in locations near public buildings
such as schools, municipal cent
ers, and post offices, as well as in public
parking areas. Commercial businesses and employment centers should
also be encouraged to provide bike racks as a service to their customers
and employees.
Figure 10 ‐ Above, poor drainage
grate choice; Below, bicycle ‐
friendly grate (photos courtesy of
Syrcast)
Figure 11 ‐ Example of bike hazard striping
Figure 12 ‐ Pavement Overlays
Warren County Bicycle Plan
18
b. Partnerships
The improvements outlined in this plan are extensive, and will take a significant
and focused effort to bring about. In addition, implementation will be at the
hands of many different agencies. For on‐road facilities, the implementation lead
is likely to be the roadway owner. For off‐road facilities, a wider variety of lea
d
agencies is possible: local municipalities, recreation and open space groups, or
the WCS&QBO itself. Any projects which involve acquisition of easements or
rights ‐of ‐way will also involve the landowners as a key stakeholder. WCS&QBO,
along with A/GFTC, will play important roles in maintaining open communication
with these gr oups as
implementation of bicycle improvement projects is
undertaken.
In terms of maintenance, it can be assumed that on ‐road bike facilities will be the
responsibility of whichever agency currently maintains the roadway itself, unless
other specific provisions are made. For multi ‐use trails, there may be partnership
opportuniti es to provide some
or all maintenance services. This can take the
forms of occasional volunteer events, such as trail‐ cleaning days, or a more
formal maintenance agreement between agencies and groups to perform
maintenance.
In addition, WCS&QBO, as a 501(c)3 non‐profit organization, may be able to assist
in identifying and im plem
enting some of the spot improvements listed in this
plan. For example, this group may be able to create and maintain an inventory of
individual hazards, and may also be able to seek funding for the roadway owners
to address these concerns. It may also be possible to partner to pe rform target
ed
road sweepings or trail maintenance, with help from the local and county DPWs.
Sponsored community events such as these would also raise the profile of the
organization and provide an important community education benefit.
c. Funding Sources
The following funding sources have historically been available for projects which
involve bicy cl
e facilities. Not all of these programs are currently active;
conversely, new programs may arise which could be applied towards bicycle
facilities. In selecting funding sources, it is important to keep in mind the
stipulations and requirements of the funding agency. For instance, projects
funded under NYSDOT’s Transportation Enhancements Program mu st follow the
State’s desi
gn, bidding, and grant reporting process, which can be very involved.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
19
Program Granting Agency On‐or Off‐
Road Eligible
Activities Local
Match
Transportation
Enhancements
Program NYS
Department
of Transportation
(NYSDOT) Both
Provision of Facilities for Bicycles and Pedestrians (on ‐
or off ‐road) Yes
Make
the Connection A/GFTC BothSmall‐scale projects that improve the region’s bicycle
and pedestrian travel network Yes
Transportation,
Community, System
Preservation
Program (TCSP) FHWA/NYSDOT
On‐Road Planning, development, and implementation of
strategies to integrate transportation, community, and
system preservation plans and practices Yes
Highway
Safety
Improvement
Projects (HSIP) FHWA/NYSDOT
Both Safety improvement projects on any public road or
publically owned bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail. Yes
National
Scenic
Byways Discretionary
Grants Federal
Highway
Administration
(FHWA) On
‐Road Construction along a scenic byway of a facility for
pedestrians and bicyclists; safety improvements for
deficiencies resulting from designation as a Byway Yes
Consolidated
Local
Street and Highway
Improvement
Program (CHIPS) NYSDOT
On‐Road Local highway projects which can include elements
such as: Bike lanes and wide curb lanes; shared use
paths, and bike paths within the highway ROW No
Recreational
Trails
Program NYS
Office of
Parks, Recreation,
and Historic
Preservation (NYS
OPRHP) Off
‐Road Acquisition, development, rehabilitation and
maintenance of multi ‐use trails Yes
Local
Waterfront
Revitalization
Program NYS
Department
of State (NYSDOS) Both
Implementation of projects listed in a locally adopted
Waterfront Revitalization Plan; communities without
this type of plan are not eligible to apply Yes
Adirondack
Smart
Growth Grants NYS
Department
of Environmental
Conservation
(NYSDEC) Both
Focused on planning and design projects including:
Efficient transportation systems; Main streets, including
bicycle and pedestrian access; Public access
improvements, including trails No
Creating
Healthy
Places to Live, Work,
and Play NYS
Department
of Health Both
Small grants available to municipalities to pursue
Complete Streets projects or purchase bicycle racks, if
community has passed Complete Streets policy No
Warren County Bicycle Plan
20
Appendix 1: Detailed Maps
To facilitate implementation among individual municipalities, a series of more
detailed priority maps has been prepared. These maps depict the same content as
Maps 2 and 3 of this plan, on a larger scale. The map contents include:
Map A: Glens Falls/Southern Queensbury
Map B: Lake Luzerne
Map C: Lake George/Northern Quee nsbury
Map D: Warrensburg
Map E: Stony Creek
Map F:
Bolton
Map G: Thurman
Map H: Hague
Map I: Horicon
Map J: Chester
Map K: Johnsburg
^
_k
®qñ
ñ
ñ
ñ
ñSWEET RDI
A
Queensbury Glens Falls
Lake Luzerne
§
¨ ¦87
§
¨ ¦87
W Mounta in R d
Bay Rd
Quaker Rd
Luzerne Rd
DIX Ave
Ridge Rd
Dixon Rd
Corinth Rd
State R
out
e 9
Glen St
Hav
iland Rd
Bay St
Sanford St
Aviation Rd
Potter Rd
Upper Sherman
A ve
Ridge St
Cr
onin R
d
Meadowbrook Rd
Main St
Q u
eensbur
y Ave
W
arr
en St
Broad St
Hi
cks Rd
Ri ver StMaple St
Country Club Rd
Boulevard
Round Pond Rd
Platt St
South St
Elm St
Grant Ave
Sherman Ave
Lawrence St
G lenwood
A ve
Upper
Gl
en St
Staple St
Blind Rock R
d
Haskell Ave
Mohican St
Webster Ave
Mountain View Ln
Lower Warren St
Thomas St
Le
xi
ngto n
A v
e
Western Ave
Main St
.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
Map A – Glens Falls/South Queensbury Inset
No Scale
Legend
ñGovernment Office
®qWarren County Airport
kSUNY Adirondack
^
_Major Retail Center
kPublic Schools
Parks (Local)
Waterbodies
Bike Routes
Proposed Off-Road Trails
Warren County Bikeway
Feeder Canal Park Heritage Trail
WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Local Priority Routes
A/GFTC Priority Routes (Staff)
Other Roads
Interstate
Major Roads
Local Streets
Prepared by: A/GFTCI
AWarren County Bikeway Parking Lot
ñ
kk
k
Lake Luzerne
Queensbury
Warrensburg
Lake George
Stony Creek
L
a
k
e A
ve
S
tate Route
9
N
C a
ll
S t
R
a
lp
h R
d
How e
R d
E
R iv
er D
r
Be
art
o w
n
R d
O ld
S t
a g e
R d
V
ie l
e
P o
nd R d
G
ai
l
e y
H
ill
R d
H
al
l
H i
ll R
d
Riv
er
R d
G
l
e n s
F a
ll
s
M ou
n
ta i
n R
d
Th
o
m as
R
d
But
t e
rm
i
l
k
R d
S
c
o fi
e l
d
R d
H
ad
le
y R
d
V
an
are
L
n
La
ke
T
o u
r R
d
T
u t
h i
ll R d
G
ag e
H i
l
l R d
C
ori
n t
h R
d
Dunkle
y
R
d
Hy
la
n d
D
r
B
ay
R
d
Da
n ie
ls
R d
L
y
n ch
D
r
H arr
is
R
d
Tr
a
ve
r
R
d
B u
tl
er
P on
d
R d
7t
h
A
ve
R
ea
d
P
a
rk
R
d
Haw k
R
d
4W D
R
o
ad
M ain
S t
Te
rr
a ce D
r
Pin e
w oo
d
s
R d
M
aso n
D r
R
os
e
A v
e
S pi
er
F
all
s
R d
H
ar tm an
L
o
op
Iv y
L n
Le
d g
eb
ro o
k
L n
D
ri
v e
w a
y
C l
u te D
r
E R i
v er
D r
R
iv e
r
R
d
B e
ar
to
w n
R
d
.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
Map B – Lake Luzerne Inset
No Scale
Legend
Streets_ALIS selection
kPublic Schools
ñGovernment Office
Proposed Off-Road Trails
Existing Off-Road Trails
WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Local Priority Routes
A/GFTC Priority Routes (Staff)
Other Roads
Interstate
Major Roads
Local Streets
Waterbodies
NYS Recreation Areas
Parks (Local)Prepared by: A/GFTC
ññ
ñ
ñ
ñ
k
k
k
Queensbury
Lake George
Bolton
Warrensburg Lake
Luzerne
§
¨
¦87
§
¨
¦87
R i
d
ge
R d
US
Hwy 9
State Ro
ut e
9L
La ke Shore Dr
State
Route 9N
State Route 9
S tate
R
o
u
te 149
Canada S tL
ak
esh o
re
D r
Ba
y
R d
Be
ac
h
R
d
Ba y
R
d
M id
dl
e R
d
Tru
esda
le
H i
ll
R d
Fla t
R oc
k R
d
Cl
e ve
rd
al
e R
d
G
og
gi
n s
R d
Pi
c k
l
e
H i
l l
R d
B
lo
o d
y
Po
nd
R
d
Dump
R
d
Sh
a
w R
d
Big
H
ollo w
B r
Ru
ssell Hi ll
Rd
F o
x
R
d
Lake P
kw yA
ss
em b
ly
P oi
n t
R d
Pi
lo
t K
no
b
R dS
eely
e
R d
S
un
s
e t
T
rlBi
r
c h
A
ve
C l
e m
en
ts
R d
M u
d
P
o
nd
Rd
R o
ck
h u
rs t
R d
F
r
o
n t
S t
D
ri
v e
w ay
S
hop
R d
T
ra vi
s
T
rl
B a
rt
hel
L n
V i
t o
R d
Car
r
L n
La k
e Rd
A l
e x
y
R d
Ru
ss
e l
l H i
ll
R
d
O tt
a w
aD
ies
k
au
G ag
e
.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
Map C – Lake George/Nor th Queensbury Inset
No Scale
Legend
kPublic Schools
ñGovernment Office
Waterb odies
Proposed Off-Road Trails
Existing Off-Road Trails
WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Local Priority Routes
A/GFTC Staff Priority Routes Other Roads
Interstate
Major Roads
Local Streets
Prepared by: A/GFTC
Proposed off-road
connection to
Recreation Center
Proposed off-road
connection between
Bikeway & Route 9
k
k
C
A
N A
D A
O TT
A W
A
D
IES
KA U
WE
S T
B R O
O
KSEW EL
L
GAG
E
BIR
CH
P
R O
SP
E C
T
M T
N
M
OU
NTA
IN
L A
K E
S H
O R
E
D R
BE
A CH
R D
§
¨
¦87
Inset Area
ñññ
ñ
ñ
k
k
k
Bolton
Warrensburg
Lake George
§
¨ ¦87
§
¨ ¦87
State
Route 9
US Hwy 9
Main St
State Route 28
S
tate Rout e
418
River St
State Route 28
River Rd
Schroon River Rd
Pucker St
Mud St
E Schroon River Rd
Alden Ave
Glen Athol Rd
Atateka Dr
High St
Wall StGolf Course Rd
Friends Lake Rd
Dippikill Rd
Valley Rd
Viele Pond Rd
Bowen Hill R d
Athol Rd
Old Route 9
Harrington H ill Rd
Stock Farm Rd
Stony Creek Rd
Ramp
Fox Ln
Rock Ave
Tripp Lake Rd
Charles Olds Rd
Library Ave
Cameron Rd
Potter Brook R d
Frost St
Lamb Hill Rd
Big Hollow Br
Buyce C ross Rd
Cross Rd
Sweet Rd
Forest Lake Rd
Dump Rd
Hendricks Rd
Combs Rd
Oak St
Darrowsville Rd
River St
Jenni Jill Dr
Adirondack Park Preserve
Rollies Rd
Penman Dr
Warren St
Kathy Xing
Pinto Ln
River Ln
Ledgebrook Ln
Driveway
Ramp
Ramp
Ramp
Ramp
.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
Map D – Warrensburg
No Scale
Legend
kPublic Schools
ñGovernment Office
Waterbodies
Parks (Local)
Proposed Off-Road Trails
WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Local Priority Routes
A/GFTC Staff Priority Routes
Interstate
Major Roads
Local Streets
Prepared by: A/GFTC
ñ
ñ
ThurmanStony Creek Wa r re n s b u r g
Ha
rri
s b
u
rg
R d
M
ud S
t
H ig
h
S t
H
ad l
e y
R d
W
arr
e n s
b
u rg
R d
La
n
fe
a r
R d
S
t
a te s
R d
Le
n s L
ake
R dW
ol
f
P on
d
R d
D
ar
tm
ou
th
R d
Fo
dd
er R
d
Riv e
r
R
d
W ai
t e
R
d
Br
a n
n on
R
d
Z
al
t z
R
d
Mu r
ra
y
R d
Bu
tt e r
m
il
k R d
T
h
o m
a
s
R d
W
T uc ke
r
R
d
Be
a r
P o
nd
R d
D
re
xel
R
d
Van
au
ken
R d
Sta te s
R d E
R i
l e
y H ill
R d
Da
r
li n
g
R d
W al
s h
R d
S
n
o w
R d
L
e
d ge
b ro
ok
L
n
.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
Map E – Stony Creek
No Scale
Legendñ
Government OfficeWaterbodiesParks (Local)NYS Recreation AreasProposed Off-Road TrailsExisting Off-Road Trails
WCS&QBO Priority RoutesLocal Priority RoutesA/GFTC Priority Routes (Staff)
Other RoadsInterstateMajor RoadsLocal Streets
Prepared by: A/GFTC
ñ
ñ
k
Bolton Hague
Horicon
Warrensburg
Lake George
§
¨
¦87
§
¨
¦87
Lake S
hore
D
r
Lakeshore Dr
US Hwy 9
S
tat
e Route 8
Lake Shore
D r
S
c
h r
o
o n
R i
v er
R d
E
S ch
ro
o
n
R iv
e
r
R d
W
a
l
l
S t
P
a
d
an
a
r
u m
R
d
C ount y
H w
y
1 1
C
ooli
d
g
e
H i
l
l R d
F
ed e
r
a l
H
il
l R
d
D ia
m on
d
Po
in
t
R d
Valle y W oo
d
s R d
E
dg
ec
o m
b Po
nd R
d
H
ay
e s
b ur
g
R d
Po
tt
e r
H i
ll
R d
P
uc
k
er S
t
Tro
u t L
a
ke
R d
Bu
rn
t
H
il
l R
d
N
Bo
lt o n
Rd
H
en d
ri
c k
s
R d
L
am b
H
il
l
R d
Ne
w
V
e
rm
ont
R d
S
T r
o u
t
L a
k
e
R d
Al
d er
B ro
ok
R d
Tr
out
F all
s R d
H
ori
c
o n A
ve
R a
m p
Fi
n kl
e R
d
H a
rr is
R d
S
awm i
ll
R d
O a
k
Pl
H o
m er
P o
in
t
R d
Bro
ok
S t
D
uel
l
H
ill
R d
T
i
m lo
D
r
Pa
tr ic
k
L n
3
O
aks
D
r
Pi
n
to
L n
B r
a l
e y
P t
P
il o
t
K no
b R
d
All
e n R
d
S
er
v i
c e
R oa
d
R
ose
L
n
E v
a L
n
Ra m
p
.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
Map F – Bolton Inset
No Scale
Legend
kPublic Schools
ñGovernment Office
Waterbodies
Parks (Local)
NYS Recreation Areas
Proposed Off-Road Trails
Existing Off-Road Trails
WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Local Priority Routes
A/GFTC Priority Routes (Staff)
Other Roads
Interstate
Major Roads
Local Streets
Prepared by: A/GFTC
Æ b
ñ ñ
Johnsburg
Thurman
Stony Creek
Wa r re n s b u r g
State Hwy
8
S
ta
te
R
o
ute 41 8
S
t
ate Route 28
r is
b u
rg
R
d
Riv
e r
R
d
M
ud
S t
G l
e n
A
th
o l
R d
G
ar
n e
t
L
ak
e
R d
S
J
o
h ns
b u
r
g R
d
Hi
g h
S tV
al
le y
R
d
Dip
p
ik
i
l l
R
d
Ba
rt
m an
R
W a
rr e
n s
b ur
g
R d
A
ld en
A
ve
L a
n fe a
r
R
d
M ounta
in
R
d
Be
a
r
P on
d R d
G
o
lf
C o
u rs e
R d
S
ta t
e
s
R d
W
ol
f
P
on
d R
d
Dar
tm o
u t
h
R d
B
ow
en
H
il l
R
d
Ath ol
R
d
O l
d Ro
ut
e
9
S
ki
H i
R
d
S
to n
y
C
re e
k
R d
Arm
s
tr o
ng
R
d
Br a
n n
on
Rd
Z a
lt
z R
d
M
ur
r a
y R
d
Po
tt
e r
b ro
ok
R
d
W
Tu c
ker
R
d
Dr e
xel
R
d
Cha
rl
e s
O l
d s
R
d
Ca
m ero n
R
d
V
an a
u k
e n
R
d
Fro
st
S
t
Sta te s R d
E
B u
yc
e C
ro
s
s R
d
Buc
kle
y
R d
C
ro s
s
R d
P
ai
n
t B
e
d
R d
H
en
ry
W e
sc
o tt
Rd
C o
mb s
R d
D
ar
li
n g
R d
W
als
h R d
C
ro
sb
y
R d
B
ar
to
n R
d
Sn ow
geb r
o
ok
L n
.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
Map G – Thurman
No Scale
Legend
NYS Recreation AreasParks (Local)Waterbodies
ñ
Government Office
Æ b
Rail Station
Proposed Off-Road TrailsExisting Off-Road TrailsWCS&QBO Priority RoutesLocal Priority RoutesA/GFTC Priority Routes (Staff)
Other RoadsInterstateMajor RoadsLocal Streets
Prepared by: A/GFTC
ñ
Hague
Lakeshore Dr
G
ra
p
hi
t e
M
ou
nta
in
R d
Lake Shore Dr
State
R
oute 8
W ar
d s
b o r
o
R d
W e
st
H a
g u
e
R d
N e
w
H
ag
u e
R
d
B attl
e H
il
l
R
d
P
ad a
n a
ru m
R
d
Si
l v
e r
B
ay
R
d
D o
dd
H
il
l R d
S
um
m
it
D r
C a
m p
R
d
B
att
le
H
il l
S
pu r
C
om
st
o c
k R
d
O l
d Mi
ll
R d
T
e
rr
a
ce
R d
D r
iv e
w a
y
W
H oll
o w
R
d
Fr
o g
L n
N
ew
H ag u
e R
d
.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
Map H – Hague Inset
No Scale
Legend
kPublic Schools
ñGovernment Office
Waterbodies
Parks (Local)
NYS Recreation Areas
Proposed Off-Road Trails
Existing Off-Road Trails
WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Local Priority Routes
A/GFTC Priority Routes (Staff)
Other Roads
Interstate
Major Roads
Local Streets
Prepared by: A/GFTC
ññk
Horicon
§
¨
¦87
State Rou
t
e
8
Sta
te
Route 9
US H
wy 9
State Route
9
S tate
Route 8
E
S ho
re
D r
Pa
li
s a
d es
R d
V
a
l
e
n ti
n e
R d
P
ad a
n
ar
u m
R d
S
ch
ro
o
n
R i
v e
r R
d
B
ean
R d
C
am p
R
d
Do
rs et
R
d
B ea
ve
r
P o
nd
R
d
Sha
w H i
ll R d
Ro
ck
A
v
e
L an
do
n H
ill R
d
Hayesb u
r
g R
d
Pe
as
e
H
il
l R
d
Jo
hn
so
n
R d
G
ra
s s
vil
le
R
d
Bu
rn
t H
ill
R d
P
uck
er
S t
H
ori
c
o n
A
v
e
P h
ar
o h
R d
He
n
dri
c ks
R d
St
a rb
uck
H
il
l
R d
A l
d e
r B
ro
ok
R d
P
in e
S t
R am
p
Tr ou
t F alls
R d
Ca
r
l T u
rn
er
R
d
Du
e
l
l H
il
l R
d
Davi
s
R
d
Ne
w V
e
rm o
n
t
R d
S
I k e H
ayes
R d
L
i
ly
P
on
d
R
d
B l
a
ir
R
d
H a
rr is
R d
O l
d
S c
h
ro
on
R d
H
em
i
n gw
ay
R d
P
in
e L
n
S h
ort
S
t
In g
r
a h
am R
d
M ay
R d
R
ed
W i
n g
R d
B
en t
L
ee R
d
New
S
t
M a
ri
e
L n
P
in to
L n
C
am
p
R
d
Ram
p
.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
Map I – Horicon Inset
No Scale
Legend
kPublic Schools
ñGovernment Office
Waterbodies
Parks (Local)
NYS Recreation Areas
Proposed Off-Road Trails
Existing Off-Road Trails
WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Local Priority Routes
A/GFTC Priority Routes (Staff)
Other Roads
Interstate
Major Roads
Local Streets
Prepared by: A/GFTC
ññ
ñk
k
Chester
§
¨
¦87
§
¨
¦87
S
ta t
e
R
oute
2
8
State Ro u
te
9
US Hwy 9
State Ro
ute 8
Olmstedville RdSta
te Hwy
28N
Sta t
e Hwy
8
S tate
R
o
u
te
8
State Rou
te 9
State Route 28
State Rou
te 8
P
uck
e r
St
R
ive r
R
d
Ig e
rn
a R
d
E S
hor
e
D
r
Fri
e
n ds
L
a
ke
R d
V
al
e
n t
in
e R d
A
ta
te
ka
D
r
S
J o h
nsb
urg
R d
L
a
n d
on
H i
ll R
d
Sch
ro on
R iv e r
R d
B
e
a n
R
d
Hu
d so
n
S t
W
a
d d
el
l
R d
M
a
in
S t
S
haw
H
il
l
R d
R
ock
A ve
G
le
n A
th
ol
R
d
B yr
n e
s
R d
H
arr in
g to
n
R d
S
to
ck
F
ar
m
R d
J
o
h
n so
n
R
d
D ip
pik
ill
R d
Va
n
d
er
w
alk
er
R
d
O ld
R o
ut
e
9
L a
n e
R
d
Pa
r
k
R d
Bu r
n t
Hi
ll
Rd
P err
y
R
d
F
ox
L n
F
e
rr
i
s s
R d
H
a
rd s
c
ra
b b
le
R d
St
a rb
u
ck
H i
l
l R
d
Hea
th
R d
V
al
e n t
in
e P
ond
R
d
Ra
m p
G
ra
n d
vi
e w
Rd
D ur
k in
R d
P
o
tte
r B
ro
ok
R
d
D
av
is
R d
C
am
p
g r
o un
d
R d
T
h e
ri
o t
A
ve
W
e
st
R d
Va
car
R d
O
w
en
s
R d
D
r
iv
ew a
y
O
ld
S
ch r
o o n
R d
Pr
io
ry
D r
Pi
n
e L
n
Ver
n
T
e n
n yso n
R d
Sh
o r
t
S
t
Ta
n n
e
ry
R
d
M
ah o
ne
y D
r
Holl a
n d
R d
J
o
ne
s R
d
A
ust
in
P o
nd
R d
R
ed
W
in
g
R d
P
ort
e r
R d
M a
r
ie
L
n
E m i
ly
L n
E
S h
or
e
D
r
R am p
Ri
v er
R
d
.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
Map J – Chester Inset
No Scale
Legend
kPublic Schools
ñGovernment Office
Waterbodies
Parks (Local)
NYS Recreation Areas
Proposed Off-Road Trails
Existing Off-Road Trails
WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Local Priority Routes
A/GFTC Priority Routes (Staff)
Other Roads
Interstate
Major Roads
Local Streets
Prepared by: A/GFTC
ñ
k
Johnsburg
State Hwy
8
Stat e Rou te 28
State Hwy 28N
P
eac
eful Va
lley R
d
G a
r
n et
L
ak
e R
d
Riv
er
R d
Ba
rtm a
n
R d
Go
od
m a
n R d
H
u
d so
n
S t
1
3 th
L
ake
R d
M
ai
n S t
H
a
rv
ey
R d
O
ld
R i
v er
R d
S
J
o h ns
b u
r
g R d
C
ou
lt
e r
R d
S
ki H i
R
d
Ch at
ie
m ac
Rd
O l
d F
ar
m R
d
B y
rn e
s R
d
Ar
m s
t
r o
n g
R d
P
ark
R d
Ov en
M o
un ta i
n
R dB
a
ck
T
o S o
d om
R dE
dw
ar
ds
H ill
R d
R
oger
s
Rd
D u
rkin
Rd
Owe
n s
R
d
C ro
ss R
d
4
-H
R d
B
ar
n e
y H
il
l R d
Ho
l
la
n d R
d
A
usti
n P
o
nd
R d
S
he
ild s
R d
O s
h er
R d
.
Warren County Bicycle Plan
Map K – Johnsburg Inset
No Scale
Legend
kPublic Schools
ñGovernment Office
Waterbodies
Parks (Local)
NYS Recreation Areas
Proposed Off-Road Trails
Existing Off-Road Trails
WCS&QBO Priority Routes
Local Priority Routes
A/GFTC Priority Routes (Staff)
Other Roads
Interstate
Major Roads
Local Streets
Prepared by: A/GFTC